By Don't Get Married WA editorial desk · Washington · Source links checked: 2026-09-07
Last legally reviewed: Not yet attorney reviewed. Law-current-through: Not certified. This guide organizes sources and questions; it does not apply law to your circumstances.

Massachusetts and Texas illustrate different approaches to equity compensation. The comparison is educational only and does not predict a Washington result.

CURRENT LAW

Washington uses its own statutes and decisions. RCW 26.09.080 uses a just-and-equitable property standard, while RCW 26.19.071 addresses support income.

COMPARISON

Massachusetts’ 2025 child-support guidelines expressly discuss stock options and similar incentives, with guideline commentary and case references. Texas Family Code provisions address separate-property fractions for restricted stock and stock options and require decrees to determine rights in employee plans. Those structures are useful comparisons, not Washington law.

POLICY PROBLEM

Different statutory structures show why a Washington reform proposal should identify the award type, service period, and legal purpose instead of importing another state’s formula.

Questions for a qualified professional

  • Which state’s law actually governs the proceeding?
  • Is the comparison about support, property, or taxes?
  • What Washington authority controls the issue?

Frequently asked questions

Can a Massachusetts or Texas formula be used in Washington?

No. Other-state rules may inform policy discussion, but Washington courts apply Washington statutes and binding Washington authority.

Sources

Report an error in this guide